<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can You Resell a Self-Pubbed Book?</title>
	<link>http://www.advancedfictionwriting.com/blog/2010/07/09/can-you-resell-a-self-pubbed-book/</link>
	<description>America's Mad Professor of Fiction Writing</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Heine</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedfictionwriting.com/blog/2010/07/09/can-you-resell-a-self-pubbed-book/#comment-10430</link>
		<author>Adam Heine</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.advancedfictionwriting.com/blog/2010/07/09/can-you-resell-a-self-pubbed-book/#comment-10430</guid>
					<description>Randy's answer is good (and I really like his vision of the future of publishing). But if what you mean, Victor, is, "If I query my novel to traditional publishers, will they dismiss it immediately because it was already self-published?"

The answer (implied by Randy, but not said outright, I think) is it depends on how well it sold as a self-published book. If it sold well (I'm thinking many tens of thousands of copies, though it probably depends on the publisher), then they might be interested. Otherwise, no.

If, like me, your heart is set on traditional publishing, then the best thing you can do with a rejected novel is to take what you learned from it and write something new and better.

&lt;strong&gt;Randy sez&lt;/strong&gt;: I'm not a publisher, but my understanding is that they'd be quite interested in working with any author who could show a track record of sales of more than 5,000 copies on a self-published book. If I were a publisher, I'd certainly be eager to back an author like that, because an author who can move that many copies on their own could probably sell 5 to 10 times that number with the marketing power of a major publisher. I met a young writer a few years ago at a writing conference who had sold 6,000 copies of her self-published urban romance novel in less than a year. She gave me a copy of her book and I read it on the plane going home. I introduced her via email to five agents who I thought might be interested in her. One of them signed her and fairly soon thereafter sold a series deal to a major publisher. In the past, this kind of thing was fairly rare. In the future, I think it'll happen more and more often and will eventually become the new norm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy&#8217;s answer is good (and I really like his vision of the future of publishing). But if what you mean, Victor, is, &#8220;If I query my novel to traditional publishers, will they dismiss it immediately because it was already self-published?&#8221;</p>
<p>The answer (implied by Randy, but not said outright, I think) is it depends on how well it sold as a self-published book. If it sold well (I&#8217;m thinking many tens of thousands of copies, though it probably depends on the publisher), then they might be interested. Otherwise, no.</p>
<p>If, like me, your heart is set on traditional publishing, then the best thing you can do with a rejected novel is to take what you learned from it and write something new and better.</p>
<p><strong>Randy sez</strong>: I&#8217;m not a publisher, but my understanding is that they&#8217;d be quite interested in working with any author who could show a track record of sales of more than 5,000 copies on a self-published book. If I were a publisher, I&#8217;d certainly be eager to back an author like that, because an author who can move that many copies on their own could probably sell 5 to 10 times that number with the marketing power of a major publisher. I met a young writer a few years ago at a writing conference who had sold 6,000 copies of her self-published urban romance novel in less than a year. She gave me a copy of her book and I read it on the plane going home. I introduced her via email to five agents who I thought might be interested in her. One of them signed her and fairly soon thereafter sold a series deal to a major publisher. In the past, this kind of thing was fairly rare. In the future, I think it&#8217;ll happen more and more often and will eventually become the new norm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ML Eqatin</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedfictionwriting.com/blog/2010/07/09/can-you-resell-a-self-pubbed-book/#comment-10435</link>
		<author>ML Eqatin</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 14:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.advancedfictionwriting.com/blog/2010/07/09/can-you-resell-a-self-pubbed-book/#comment-10435</guid>
					<description>So long as the author owns all the rights, just put a new title on the thing, use a different pseudonym, and remarket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So long as the author owns all the rights, just put a new title on the thing, use a different pseudonym, and remarket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Thorkildsen</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedfictionwriting.com/blog/2010/07/09/can-you-resell-a-self-pubbed-book/#comment-10437</link>
		<author>Debbie Thorkildsen</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 15:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.advancedfictionwriting.com/blog/2010/07/09/can-you-resell-a-self-pubbed-book/#comment-10437</guid>
					<description>A friend of mine self-published a book in December.  In June she won an award for her book and an honourable mention for another award.  A German publisher has contacted her for possible translation and publication in German.  Looks like Randy's predictions are on track.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine self-published a book in December.  In June she won an award for her book and an honourable mention for another award.  A German publisher has contacted her for possible translation and publication in German.  Looks like Randy&#8217;s predictions are on track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley DuBois</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedfictionwriting.com/blog/2010/07/09/can-you-resell-a-self-pubbed-book/#comment-10446</link>
		<author>Wesley DuBois</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 03:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.advancedfictionwriting.com/blog/2010/07/09/can-you-resell-a-self-pubbed-book/#comment-10446</guid>
					<description>Yes finally, Randy who is an awesome writer/storyteller will self-publish. Puhlease tell me you will continue the City of God series (CoG)? I will kiss you on the lips even with the funky stache that most scientists seem to have. I was the guy who boycotted Z for not publishing the CoG series and recommended that you self-publish then. Well I had a house fire and lost all my hard copies of your books and it would be such a pleasure to have them again. What are some of your books we fans of your fiction can look forward to?

What A happy day!

&lt;strong&gt;Randy sez&lt;/strong&gt;: I no longer have the mustache, but even without that impediment, I'll have to pass on the smooch. Yes, my plan is to release all my novels, including the City of God series. Then I'll release a couple of other books that never got published. Assuming those do well (and I have a great track record of launching electronic products over the last few years, so I have a strong feeling they'll all do well), I'll continue the City of God series for another 3 or maybe even 4 books. Stay tuned over the next few months as the details for all these firm up. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes finally, Randy who is an awesome writer/storyteller will self-publish. Puhlease tell me you will continue the City of God series (CoG)? I will kiss you on the lips even with the funky stache that most scientists seem to have. I was the guy who boycotted Z for not publishing the CoG series and recommended that you self-publish then. Well I had a house fire and lost all my hard copies of your books and it would be such a pleasure to have them again. What are some of your books we fans of your fiction can look forward to?</p>
<p>What A happy day!</p>
<p><strong>Randy sez</strong>: I no longer have the mustache, but even without that impediment, I&#8217;ll have to pass on the smooch. Yes, my plan is to release all my novels, including the City of God series. Then I&#8217;ll release a couple of other books that never got published. Assuming those do well (and I have a great track record of launching electronic products over the last few years, so I have a strong feeling they&#8217;ll all do well), I&#8217;ll continue the City of God series for another 3 or maybe even 4 books. Stay tuned over the next few months as the details for all these firm up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obinna Ozoigbo</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedfictionwriting.com/blog/2010/07/09/can-you-resell-a-self-pubbed-book/#comment-10521</link>
		<author>Obinna Ozoigbo</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.advancedfictionwriting.com/blog/2010/07/09/can-you-resell-a-self-pubbed-book/#comment-10521</guid>
					<description>A traditional publisher should be able to know a good book, whether or not it's selling. There are good books, more than a million of them, out there that are self-published but are not selling well, unfortunately, perhaps because the authors do not have the marketing power. Therefore, I totally disagree with Randy's assertion (or do I say opinion or insinuation?) that a book should only be rated based on its track record. J. K. Rowling, for example, suffered quite a number of rejections before her first (Harry-Porter) book was finally published. You can see with me here the very bad sense of judgment possessed by the traditional publishers. Perhaps J. K. Rowling's dream would have been killed, buried and forgotten, if that chain of rejections had not been broken, if someone (maybe the daughter of the publisher who finally gave her the benefit of the doubt) had not given her a chance. So, what am I saying? I'm saying that a self-published book must not be assessed only against the backdrop of track record. In my estimation it is immaterial. A lot of writers, especially the budding ones like me, have resorted to self-publishing out of all the frustration that emanated from the traditional publishers. They (the trado-publishers) should have a re-think forthwith, because there would never have been the Austens and the Dickens and the Pattersons and the Rowlings and the Steels today, if they had not been given, at least, a chance by the traditional publishers at their budding stages. I really pity the traditional publishers, because the stone they reject today always ends up becoming the cornerstone tomorrow, in the hands of the "risk-taking" publisher, or in the ambit of self-publishing. They know it, yet they do not want to learn their lesson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A traditional publisher should be able to know a good book, whether or not it&#8217;s selling. There are good books, more than a million of them, out there that are self-published but are not selling well, unfortunately, perhaps because the authors do not have the marketing power. Therefore, I totally disagree with Randy&#8217;s assertion (or do I say opinion or insinuation?) that a book should only be rated based on its track record. J. K. Rowling, for example, suffered quite a number of rejections before her first (Harry-Porter) book was finally published. You can see with me here the very bad sense of judgment possessed by the traditional publishers. Perhaps J. K. Rowling&#8217;s dream would have been killed, buried and forgotten, if that chain of rejections had not been broken, if someone (maybe the daughter of the publisher who finally gave her the benefit of the doubt) had not given her a chance. So, what am I saying? I&#8217;m saying that a self-published book must not be assessed only against the backdrop of track record. In my estimation it is immaterial. A lot of writers, especially the budding ones like me, have resorted to self-publishing out of all the frustration that emanated from the traditional publishers. They (the trado-publishers) should have a re-think forthwith, because there would never have been the Austens and the Dickens and the Pattersons and the Rowlings and the Steels today, if they had not been given, at least, a chance by the traditional publishers at their budding stages. I really pity the traditional publishers, because the stone they reject today always ends up becoming the cornerstone tomorrow, in the hands of the &#8220;risk-taking&#8221; publisher, or in the ambit of self-publishing. They know it, yet they do not want to learn their lesson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

